2006–2010

Why Does Sovereign Risk Differ for Domestic and External Debt? Evidence from Scandinavia, 1938–1948

Särtryck nr 2010:6

Författare: Daniel WaldenströmÅr: 2010 Publikation: Journal of International Money and Finance Årgång (nr): 29 (3) Sidor: 387–402
Artikeln online (behörighet kan krävas)


This study shows empirically that the political costs of sovereign default can differ considerably for domestic and external debt. The analysis uses new evidence from Danish and Swedish bond markets around World War II, a time when markets went from being fully integrated to fully segmented overnight. By linking the exogenous wartime shocks to changes in default costs on domestic and external debt, it is found that these costs explain a significant part of the variation in the sovereign yield spread across markets. The results suggest that governments can choose strategically on which debt, the domestic or the external, to default on, and that this decision hinges on the relative size of the political default costs.


Referens:
Waldenström, Daniel (2010), "Why Does Sovereign Risk Differ for Domestic and External Debt? Evidence from Scandinavia, 1938–1948". Journal of International Money and Finance 29(3), 387–402.

Daniel Waldenström

Kontakt

Tel: +33-754844839
Mobil: 070 491 6082
daniel.waldenstrom@if...

Aktuell forskare

Henrik Horn

Forskningsområden: Internationella handels- och investeringsavtal, konkurrenspolitik och marknadsregleringar

Några av de frågor Henrik Horn försöker besvara i sin forskning:

  • Hur ska centrala delar av WTO-avtalet tolkas?
  • Hur bör EU:s miljöpolitik utformas?

IFN kalendarium

Institutet för Näringslivsforskning, Grevgatan 34 - 2 tr, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Tel: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se