Working Paper No. 644

Investment Liberalization – Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive

Publicerad: June 9, 2005Antal sidor: 37Nyckelord: Investment Liberalization; Mergers & Acquisitions; Development; OwnershipJEL-koder: F23; K21; L13; O12

Investment Liberalization – Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive Pehr-Johan Norbäck and Lars Persson


Investment liberalizing countries are often concerned that cross-border mergers & acquisitions, in contrast to greenfield investments, might have an adverse effect on domestic firms and consumers. However, given that domestic assets are sufficiently scarce, we identify a preemption effect and an asset complementarity effect, which imply that the acquisition price is substantially higher than the domestic seller's profits. Moreover, we show that for the acquisition to take place, the MNE must be sufficiently efficient when using the domestic assets, otherwise rivals will expand their business, thereby making the acquisition unprofitable. Consequently, restricting cross-border M&As may also hurt consumers.

 

Pehr-Johan Norbäck

Kontakt

Tel: 08 665 4522
Mobil: 073 547 3379
pehr-johan.norback@if...

Lars Persson

Kontakt

Tel: 08 665 4504
lars.persson@ifn.se

Senaste boken

Flyget och företagen

 

Flyget-och-företagen.jpg

 

Shon Ferguson, IFN, och Rikard Forslid, Stockholms universitet, har forskar om flygets betydelse för näringslivet.

Forskarna visar att inrikes direktlinjer till Stockholm är viktiga för tillverkningsindustrin i kommunerna utanför de tre storstadsregionerna och att internationella direktlinjer är särskilt betydelsefulla för tjänstesektorn.

Institutet för Näringslivsforskning, Grevgatan 34 - 2 tr, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Tel: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se