This Website uses cookies. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies and to the terms and conditions listed in our data protection policy. Read more

Applied Economics

Social Assistance and Mental Health: Evidence from Longitudinal Administrative Data on Pharmaceutical Consumption

Journal Article
Reference
Dackehag, Margareta, Lina Maria Ellegård, Ulf-G. Gerdtham and Therese Nilsson (2020). “Social Assistance and Mental Health: Evidence from Longitudinal Administrative Data on Pharmaceutical Consumption”. Applied Economics 52(20), 2165–2177. doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1683149

Authors
Margareta Dackehag, Lina Maria Ellegård, Ulf-G. Gerdtham, Therese Nilsson

This paper adds to the small literature on the role of welfare benefits and mental health by studying the relationship between uptake of Social Assistance Benefit (SAB) and objective mental health measures. We use rich longitudinal administrative data on income, unemployment benefits and psychopharmaceutic prescriptions (antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics) for more than 140,000 Swedes in 2006–2012. Relative to earlier studies focusing on subjective mental health, an advantage of our approach is that we use longitudinal administrative data that do not suffer from non-response, under-reporting and self-justification biases. While we document a strong positive association between SAB and psychopharmaca consumption in ordinary least squares models, fixed effects estimates indicate that most of the association is due to unobserved individualspecific predisposition. Insofar as a relationship remains in the fixed effect models, it is driven by highly educated men. This result is consistent with earlier quantitative studies using survey data and with qualitative research suggesting that SAB uptake may be particularly stigmatizing for individuals with a higher initial socioeconomic position.