This Website uses cookies. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies and to the terms and conditions listed in our data protection policy. Read more

Working Paper No. 643

Are Objective, Official Measures of Disability Reliable?

Working Paper
Reference
Johansson, Per and Per Skedinger (2005). “Are Objective, Official Measures of Disability Reliable?”. IFN Working Paper No. 643. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).

Authors
Per Johansson, Per Skedinger

The issue considered in this study is whether objective, official reports on disability status are reliable. While there is a rather large literature on the reliability of self-reported disability, evidence regarding objective data is scant. It seems to be a widely held view among researchers that, since individuals out of work are inclined to respond towards poor health, it would be best to have official data provided by the relevant administrative bodies. But we argue that such administrative data should be regarded with some suspicion, since the administrators also may have incentives to misreport. The empirical evidence, based on a large sample of Swedish jobseekers, suggests systematic misreporting by the Public Employment Service of objective, official disability measures due to incentives to exaggerate disability.

 

Per Skedinger

+46 (0)8 665 4553
+46 (0)70 486 0389
per.skedinger@ifn.se