2017

Are OECD Policy Recommendations for Public Sector Reform Biased against Welfare States? Evidence from a New Database

Reprint No. 2017:41

Author(s): Andreas Bergh, Margareta Dackehag and Martin RodeYear: 2017 Title: European Journal of Political Economy Volume (No.): 48 (June) Pages: 3–15
Online article (restrictions may apply)

Are OECD Policy Recommendations for Public Sector Reform Biased against Welfare States? Evidence from a New Database Andreas Bergh, Margareta Dackehag and Martin Rode


Policy advice by the OECD has long been at the heart of academic debates on welfare state reform, with frequent claims questioning the ideological orientation of recommendations. This paper constructs an indicator of perceived reform need for 24 countries, quantifying the policy advice contained in the OECD Economic Surveys around 1985, 1995, and 2005. These recommendations describe a policy consensus that is based on competition, work incentives, monetary reform, fiscal discipline, and labor market reform. Empirically, perceived need for reform is well explained by preceding levels of economic freedom. In particular, countries with more government intervention, lower property rights protection, and more regulation are perceived to have a bigger reform need. In turn, perceived reform need has no explanatory power for subsequent changes in social expenditure and welfare state entitlements. Only in countries with right wing governments, perceived reform need might be followed by marginal reductions in welfare state entitlements, but definitely not in social expenditure.


Reference:
Bergh, Andreas, Margareta Dackehag and Martin Rode (2017), "Are OECD Policy Recommendations for Public Sector Reform Biased against Welfare States? Evidence from a New Database". European Journal of Political Economy 48(June), 3–15.

Andreas Bergh

Contact

Mob: 070 779 0734
andreas.bergh@ifn.se

Interdisciplinary European Studies

Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times

2018-Trust-in-the-European-Union-by-Oxelheim.jpg

This is the first book in the Interdisciplinary European Studies collection. This volume provides an interdisciplinary perspective on trust in the EU from the vantage point of political science, law and economics. Lars Oxelheim, Lund University and affiliated to IFN, is one of the authors.

Events

Seminars organized by IFN

 

To present ongoing research informal brown-bag seminars are held on Mondays at 11:30 am. This is an opportunity for IFN researchers to test ideas and results.

Academically oriented seminars are most of the time held on Wednesdays at 10 am. At these events researchers from IFN and other institutions present their research.

In addition, IFN organizes seminars open to the public. Topics for these are derived from the IFN research.

Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Grevgatan 34 - 2 fl, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Phone: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se