Aktuellt

Nydisputerad IFN-forskare till OECD

2018-03-26


IFN-forskaren Louise Johannesson har disputerat vid Örebro universitet med avhandlingen Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization.  I avhandlingen behandlas frågor som rör tvistelösning inom ramen för handelsorganisationen WTO. Louise Johannesson började på IFN som forskningsassistent och har under sin tid som doktorand varit knuten till institutet. Hon kommer även fortsättningsvis att vara affilierad till IFN. Hon börjar inom kort en anställning på OECD i Paris.

2018-03-26 Avtackning Louise Johannesson.jpg
Louise Johannesson avtackades på IFN efter disputation och inför kommande flytt till OECD i Paris.

 

Sammanfattning av avhandlingen Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization:

For some time, disputes were commonly settled through diplomacy and negotiations as nations often used protectionism as a means to achieve various domestic policy goals. Today, the commitments contained in the multilateral trade agreements, organized within the World Trade Organization (WTO), are upheld through the judicial process: Dispute settlement mechanism (DSM). Since the WTOs inauguration in 1995, it has become one of the most active international dispute resolution venues in the world. However, certain aspects of the system may benefit from a closer review so as to strengthen the DSM. This cumulative dissertation consists of five self-contained essays, all of which are closely focused around dispute settlement issues. We first introduce the reader to a unique data set—we use this data set extensively throughout the dissertation—and continue with several essays that concern the functioning of the panel. Although the DSM was reformed under the WTO, there is an incentive structure in place that encourages the WTO Secretariat to assume a larger role in writing panel reports, and for panelists to let them do so. We also examine the role of provision Art. 8.10 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding in helping developing countries win disputes against richer countries. We observe, however, that developing countries lose more claims when this provision is applied. We show that this is due to selection and that the provision is helpful. We address the problem of delays by asking ourselves whether we can lessen the problem with a permanent panel. We find that the time it takes to issue panel reports can be shortened if the panel consists of former co-panelists. Lastly, we examine whether there are increases in trade after a dispute for members that are not active participants. We find such evidence but the effects are limited to disputes that settled early.

 

Institutet för Näringslivsforskning, Grevgatan 34 - 2 tr, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Tel: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se