Working Paper No. 643

Are Objective, Official Measures of Disability Reliable?

Publicerad: May 16, 2005Antal sidor: 45Nyckelord: Work Disability; Classification Error; Public Employment Service JEL-koder: I12; J28; J68

Are Objective, Official Measures of Disability Reliable? Per Johansson and Per Skedinger


The issue considered in this study is whether objective, official reports on disability status are reliable. While there is a rather large literature on the reliability of self-reported disability, evidence regarding objective data is scant. It seems to be a widely held view among researchers that, since individuals out of work are inclined to respond towards poor health, it would be best to have official data provided by the relevant administrative bodies. But we argue that such administrative data should be regarded with some suspicion, since the administrators also may have incentives to misreport. The empirical evidence, based on a large sample of Swedish jobseekers, suggests systematic misreporting by the Public Employment Service of objective, official disability measures due to incentives to exaggerate disability.

 

Per Skedinger

Kontakt

Tel: 08 665 4553
per.skedinger@ifn.se

Två filter:

Varför du har fel om nästan allt, men ändå inte vill ändra dig

Två filter av Andreas Bergh 2017 f hemsidan.jpg

Du har fel om tillståndet i världen, du har fel om vad det beror på och ändå är chansen liten att du ändrar din åsikt. Samhällsdebatten domineras av negativt tänkande förklarar Andreas Bergh, IFN, i denna bok. Han skriver att i takt med att världen blir allt bättre att leva i blir vårt instinktiva negativitetsfilter allt sämre anpassat till verkligheten.

Institutet för Näringslivsforskning, Grevgatan 34 - 2 tr, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Tel: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se