Working Paper No. 644

Investment Liberalization – Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive

Publicerad: June 9, 2005Antal sidor: 37Nyckelord: Investment Liberalization; Mergers & Acquisitions; Development; OwnershipJEL-koder: F23; K21; L13; O12

Investment Liberalization – Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive Pehr-Johan Norbäck and Lars Persson


Investment liberalizing countries are often concerned that cross-border mergers & acquisitions, in contrast to greenfield investments, might have an adverse effect on domestic firms and consumers. However, given that domestic assets are sufficiently scarce, we identify a preemption effect and an asset complementarity effect, which imply that the acquisition price is substantially higher than the domestic seller's profits. Moreover, we show that for the acquisition to take place, the MNE must be sufficiently efficient when using the domestic assets, otherwise rivals will expand their business, thereby making the acquisition unprofitable. Consequently, restricting cross-border M&As may also hurt consumers.

 

Pehr-Johan Norbäck

Kontakt

Tel: 08 665 4522
Mobil: 073 574 3379
pehr-johan.norback@if...

Lars Persson

Kontakt

Tel: 08 665 4504
lars.persson@ifn.se

Glädjeparadoxen

Historien om skolans uppgång, fall och möjliga upprättelse

Glädjeparadoxen.gif

Den här boken, författad av Gabriel Heller Sahlgren och Nima Sanadaji, spårar rötterna till den svenska skolans problem via en djupdykning i forskning och modern historia. På 1800-talet slog den progressiva utbildningsfilosofin igenom, med fokus på glädje, elevdemokrati och elevledd undervisning. Problemet var bara att den nya pedagogiken inte fungerade som det var tänkt. Forskningen tyder inte på att elever lär sig mer när de har roligt.

Läs mer

Institutet för Näringslivsforskning, Grevgatan 34 - 2 tr, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden | Tel: +46-(0)8-665 45 00 | info@ifn.se