This Website uses cookies. By using this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies and to the terms and conditions listed in our data protection policy. Read more

Constitutional Political Economy

Ownership of Firms and Efficiency: The Competence Argument

Journal Article
Reference
Pelikan, Pavel (1993). “Ownership of Firms and Efficiency: The Competence Argument”. Constitutional Political Economy 4(3), 349–392. doi.org/10.1007/BF02393268

Author
Pavel Pelikan

To assess alternative forms of ownership of firms and allocation of capital, the standard incentive argument is complemented and qualified by an argument considering competence. Regarding capital as a currency conveying decision authority for organizing production, this argument recognizes that the competence for exercising this authority is scarce. The allocation of this competence is studied as the key part of the allocation of scarce economic competence, which requires organizational change and determines the efficiency of allocation of all scarce resources, including economic competence itself. Comparative institutional analysis reveals the superiority of a constitution that requires private and tradeable ownership of firms and open entry to capital markets in the organization of supply, while it limits economic inequalities and provides for policies intervening in competence-requiring final demand.